Policy Update 21 July 2021

Changes to Chapter 14 of the NPPF: Flood Risk Updates July 2021

The July 2021 NPPF updates expanded flood risk assessment to cover all sources of flooding, broadened the sequential test, and added emphasis on property flood resilience.

By Daniel Cook

The July 2021 NPPF updates introduced several significant modifications to Chapter 14 (Planning and Flood Risk), though the overall structure remained intact. The alterations primarily involve clarified language and expanded scope regarding flood risk assessment.

Major Updates

All Sources of Flooding

Paragraph 161 now requires plans to assess “all sources of flood risk” rather than focusing solely on traditional fluvial and tidal risks. This represents a substantive shift requiring consideration of surface water and pluvial flooding in climate change modelling — an area where implementation guidance remains unclear.

Sequential Test Expansion

The sequential test now explicitly references “any source” of flooding, formalising an approach already adopted informally by Environment Agency officials and local authorities.

Exception Test Language

Changes shifted references from “zones” to “areas,” reflecting the expanded assessment scope beyond conventional flood zone classifications.

Property Resilience Emphasis

New wording emphasises that development should be “appropriately flood resistant and resilient such that…it could be quickly brought back into use without significant refurbishment,” signalling increased focus on flood-resistant construction and property flood resilience strategies.

Essential Infrastructure Additions

Solar farms and electricity infrastructure now qualify as essential infrastructure — categories previously limited in scope.

Green Infrastructure Integration

The revised language promotes incorporating “natural flood management techniques” into development design.

Practical Implications

Development sites classified as Flood Zone 1 may now face sequential test challenges if located in high-risk surface water areas. However, the exception test provisions allow flexibility when lower-risk alternatives conflict with sustainable development objectives.

The changes position flood resilience as a design requirement rather than merely a compliance checkbox, potentially making flood-mitigating developments more favourable during planning review.

NPPFflood riskpolicy updatesequential testclimate change
Work with us

Discuss your project with our team.

Our specialists publish regularly on flood risk, drainage, and planning policy. Get in touch to discuss your project.